[Access history tools + resources on the sidebar]
Over the past two years a group of distinguished history faculty worked on defining and measuring a set of learning outcomes for undergraduates in their field. The Measuring College Learning (MCL) project—organized by the Education Research Program at the Social Science Research Council—served to facilitate faculty consensus around a limited set of empirically measurable “essential concepts and competencies” that history students should gain over time. Rather than striving to produce a set of exhaustive of comprehensive list of learning outcomes, the MCL frameworks that emerged serve as a jumping off point for departments and disciplinary associations.
The MCL history panel was made up of eleven scholars with expertise on teaching, learning, and assessment in the discipline:
Julia Brookins, Special Projects Coordinator, American Historical Association
Lendol Calder, Professor of History, Augustana College
Elaine Carey, Chair and Associate Professor of History, Saint John’s University
James Grossman, Executive Director, American Historical Association
Anne Hyde, Professor of History, Colorado College
Norman Jones, Chair and Professor of History, Utah State University
Kenneth Pomeranz, Professor of History, University of Chicago
Nancy Quam-Wickham, Chair and Professor of History, California State University, Long Beach
Tracy Steffes, Assistant Professor of History and Education, Brown University
Emily Swafford, Programs Manager, American Historical Association
Maris Vinovskis, Professor of History and Public Policy, University of Michigan
At the center of each of the MCL white papers is an innovative learning outcomes framework that articulates a set of “essential concepts and competencies” for undergraduate-level learning in the discipline. Essential concepts and competencies are deep understandings and complex skills that faculty believe are fundamental to the discipline, valuable to students, and worth emphasizing given limited time and resources. The MCL learning outcomes frameworks emerge from and are part of the MCL white papers, but they can be used as stand-alone resources.
The Measuring College Learning Project is committed to the idea that the articulated frameworks are part of an iterative process that will evolve and change over time. As part of plans for phase two of the project, we envision building out and piloting assessments based on the learning outcomes frameworks presented in the whitepaper. We look forward to the work to come, as part of a collaborative process with faculty, disciplinary associations, employer groups, and other stakeholders concerned with improving student learning in higher education.
Discipline specific project materials are available under the "History Tools + Resources" sidebar.
General project materials are available under the "General Tools + Resources" sidebar.
Materials are also available in Improving Quality in American Higher Education: Learning Outcomes and Assessments for the 21st Century (Jossey Bass, 2016).